Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting
03/07/2010 - Louisville, KY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The mutuel field and Fountain of Youth champ Eskendereya came up as the top two selections at the close of betting of the second Kentucky Derby Future Wager of 2010. The third and final Future Wager takes place in three weeks.
Of the 24 available betting interests in the pool, the mutuel field closed as the 3-1 favorite after opening as the 7-2 morning-line favorite. When wagering ended on the first Future Wager last month, the mutuel field was the 3-2 favorite.
The top horse listed was Eskendereya, who was bet down to 5-1. He, along with Lookin at Lucky, were each 6-1 when wagering began Friday. Lookin at Lucky finished as the 9-1 third selection.
The 136th Kentucky Derby will be conducted on Saturday, May 1 at Churchill Downs.
Here is the complete list of the 24 betting interests for the second Kentucky Derby Future Wager.
Number Wagering Interest Morning line odds Final odds:
1. Aikenite 50-1 57-1
2. American Lion 30-1 38-1
3. Buddy's Saint 12-1 16-1
4. Caracortado 12-1 19-1
5. Connemara 20-1 46-1
6. Conveyance 12-1 28-1
7. D' Funnybone 20-1 38-1
8. Dave in Dixie 30-1 22-1
9. Discreetly Mine 30-1 37-1
10. Dublin 15-1 10-1
11. Eskendereya 6-1 5-1
12. Jackson Bend 20-1 47-1
13. Lookin At Lucky 6-1 9-1
14. Nextdoorneighbor 30-1 99-1
15. Noble's Promise 30-1 26-1
16. Odysseus 50-1 25-1
17. Radiohead 20-1 19-1
18. Rule 20-1 20-1
19. Setsuko 50-1 65-1
20. Sidney's Candy 20-1 33-1
21. Super Saver 20-1 24-1
22. Tempted to Tapit 50-1 63-1
23. Vale of York 30-1 42-1
24. All Other 3YOs (field) 7-2 3-1
<< Pavlyuchenkova downs Hantuchova to win at Monterrey
Monterrey, Mexico (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Third-seeded Russian Anastasia
Pavlyuchenkova won her second match of the day on Sunday to capture the title
at the $220,000 Monterrey Open.
Pavlyuchenkova rallied from a first-set loss t
<< Couples gets second Champions Tour win
Newport Beach, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Fred Couples captured his second
Champions Tour win Sunday at the Toshiba Classic, just three weeks after
breaking through for his first.
Three starts, two wins. It's been an explosive debut on the over-5
<< Lavender leads Ohio State to Big Ten title
Indianapolis, IN (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Jantel Lavender posted 35 points and 10
rebounds, leading 10th-ranked Ohio State to the Big Ten Tournament title with
a 66-64 win over Iowa.
Lavender went 14-of-25 from the field and was named the
<< Browns add LB Fujita, OL Pashos
Cleveland, OH (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Cleveland Browns added a pair of free
agents in linebacker Scott Fujita and offensive lineman Tony Pashos on Sunday,
signing both to multi-year contracts.
Fujita played last year for the Super Bow
West Virginia advances to Big East semis with win over DePaul >>
Hartford, CT (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Liz Repella had 16 points to help seventh-
ranked West Virginia to a 47-41 win over DePaul in the Big East quarterfinals.
Sarah Miles had nine points and five assists while Asya Bussie added nine
poin
Leighton strong in Flyers' win over Leafs >>
Philadelphia, PA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Michael Leighton made 27 saves to help the
Philadelphia Flyers take a 3-1 win over the Toronto Maple Leafs at Wachovia
Center.
Danny Briere, Simon Gagne and Jeff Carter each had a goal for the Flyers,
Kaleta scores in OT to help Sabres snap road skid >>
New York, NY (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Patrick Kaleta scored the game-winner 2:22
into overtime, as the Buffalo Sabres edged the New York Rangers, 2-1, at
Madison Square Garden.
With the overtime period halfway over, Kaleta charged down
Canadiens-Ducks Sum >>
Montreal 0 1 2 0-4Anaheim 3 0 0 0-3Montreal won shootout 2-1First Period-1, Anaheim, Perry 23 (Getzlaf, Ward), 8:54. 2, Anaheim, Visnovsky 11, 12:54 (pp). 3, Anaheim, Niedermayer 8 (Getzlaf, Wisniewski), 19:07.Second Period-4, Montreal, Pleka
The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.
While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.
For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.
1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.
2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.
How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.
Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.
Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.
How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).
Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.
Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.
Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting